Case Study · Bearpaw

$22,742 in holiday ad spend. $178,171 back. The ten weeks that decide a boot brand’s year.

5.72x

Blended ROAS, full winter

7.83x

ROAS, ten holiday weeks

2,431

Tracked purchases, FB pixel

CLIENT

Bearpaw Footwear

Industry

Footwear · Seasonal E-Commerce

Engagement

Paid Social · FB + IG · Oct 1, 2019 – Mar 2020

Offering this proves

Paid Social Advertising

01

THE STUCK POINT

The boots sold every where except their own website.

Bearpaw makes sheepskin boots and slippers, and it grew up as a wholesale brand: big retailers, big shelf space, boots moving every winter. The channel that lagged was its own. E-commerce was a catalog people browsed, not a store people bought from, and in the fall of 2019 the brand came to us with one ask: make it a sales channel.

The catalog has a hard constraint: nobody wants shearling in April. The demand curve is a spike, not a slope, and the revenue year is effectively decided between the first cold snap and the last gift-shipping day of December. That shape punishes ordinary media buying twice. Spend flat through the year and you waste money in the warm months while underfeeding the cold ones. Chase the season late and you pay peak-auction prices to reach buyers who already bought at retail.

The diagnosis: the problem was never demand. Bearpaw’s demand fills retail aisles every winter. It exists for about ten weeks, and most ad accounts are built as if every week were the same.

Retail-only pull

Big shelves, no e-comm engine

~10-week window

First cold snap → last gift ship day

Browsed, not bought

Catalog with no purchase path

02

THE BET

Retarget the catalog. Buy the cold.

We didn’t ask for a new creative library. Bearpaw already had one, product video, influencer content, a catalog full of assets shot for retail. What we rebuilt was everything underneath it: new campaign architecture, new bidding strategy, new targeting.

No prospecting moonshots. No brand-lift theater. Catalog and cold, and a weekly report with a section most ad reports don’t have: a purchase map of the states where the weather had turned.

Two engines. One winter calendar.

Dynamic Catalog Retargeting

Cold-Weather Targeting

Comment Coverage

The Thermometer Map

3 platforms. 1 unified calendar loop.

03

THE WORK

One winter, run like a season,
not a schedule.

Oct 21

Dynamic Retargeting · Catalog Sales launches

The core engine of the winter: the full product catalog, served back to people who had already shown intent. Ran every week of the engagement.

The engine

Nov 12

Cold Weather Areas goes live

The same catalog engine, duplicated and aimed at states where the temperature had dropped. Weekly reporting tracked purchases by cold-weather state from this point.

The thermometer

All season

Category discipline + reworked assets

Women’s footwear carried the account; men’s, kids’, socks, hats and scarves held small budgets and earned more only when their weekly ROAS did. Influencer content and product video the brand already owned were cut for catalog and retargeting placements instead of commissioned from scratch.

The portfolio · The inputs

Jan 6–8

Valentine’s Day Giveaway + Together Cozy launch

Shoulder-season brand awareness plays that kept the audience warm after the gift buying stopped, at giveaway-level budgets, not December-level ones.

The shoulder

Oct 21

Dynamic Retargeting · Catalog Sales launches

The core engine of the winter: the full product catalog, served back to people who had already shown intent. Ran every week of the engagement.

The engine

February

The cut

As the season died, weekly spend stepped down from $2,294 → $1,338 → $735 → $416. We kept the retargeting pilot light on and put the rest of the money away.

The discipline

Mar 8

The Relaunch

Vegan Collection catalog campaign plus a fresh retargeting engine, built for the next cycle instead of squeezing the last one.

The next season

04

The Inflection

The week of December 9, the engine hit 12.61x.

The ramp is visible week by week. The first reported week, October 21–27: 73 purchases at $17.35 each, a 5.58x return. The first week of December: 273 purchases at $9.03 each, 9.64x. Then December 9–15: 372 purchases at $6.58 apiece, a 12.61x return on $2,447.71 of spend.

Nothing about the budget changed that week. The catalog engine had spent seven weeks learning who buys, the cold-weather engine had four weeks of geography under it, and December supplied the urgency. Efficiency is what patience looks like in an ad account.

Week of December 9–15, 2019 · Bearpaw weekly report

05

THE PROOF

One winter of receipts.

Every figure below traces to one of the 20 weekly performance reports sent to Bearpaw between October 2019 and March 2020. Purchases are Facebook-pixel tracked; revenue is reconstructed weekly as reported ROAS times reported spend.

$17.35

 $6.58

Cost per purchase, first week vs. peak week

5.58x

12.61x

ROAS, first week vs. peak week

Paid Social, Counted In Dollars, Full Winter · Oct 21, 2019 – Mar 12, 2020

Metric

Result

Details

B

Metric

Blended ROAS

5.72x

Result

$35,976.57 spend → $205,943 tracked revenue

Details

P

Metric

Tracked purchases

2,431

Result

$14.80 blended cost per purchase

Details

I

Metric

Impressions

2.58M

Result

48,876 link clicks · 1.9% CTR

Details

R

Metric

Weekly reports

20

Result

Every number on this page traces to one

Details

The Harvest Window, Oct 21 – Jan 5

Metric

Result

Details

H

Metric

Holiday ROAS

7.83x

Result

$22,741.58 spend → $178,170.97 revenue

Details

C

Metric

Cost per purchase

$11.13

Result

Across the ten reported holiday weeks

Details

D

Metric

December ROAS

9.49x

Result

Dec 2–29: 1,135 purchases, $9,815.63 spend

Details

R

Metric

Peak week ROAS

12.61x

Result

Dec 9–15: 372 purchases at $6.58 each

Details

Methodology: two reports overlap by three days (Jan 20–26 and Jan 24–30); the overlapping week is excluded from full-run totals, so full-winter figures are conservative. One week (Oct 28–Nov 3) has no report in the set and is likewise uncounted.

06

THE UNLOCK

ROAS isn’t won in the auction. It’s won in the calendar.

The auction never changed, same platforms, same catalog, the same assets Bearpaw already owned. What changed was the architecture underneath them and where the dollars landed: on people who had already touched the products, in states where the temperature had dropped, in the weeks when a warm boot is an easy yes.

And when the season died, we acted like it. Spend came down 82% across February. It went back up on March 8 with a reason: a new vegan collection and a fresh retargeting engine, built for the next window instead of squeezing the last one.

A seasonal brand doesn’t need an always-on ad account. It needs an agency that knows which ten weeks decide the year.

$205,943

Tracked purchase revenue, one winter

82%

February spend cut once demand died

2,431

Purchases, Facebook-pixel tracked

5.72x

Blended ROAS across the engagement

2.58M

Impressions · 1.9% link CTR

20

Weekly reports, every figure sourced

Sell something the calendar controls?

We run paid social the way seasons actually behave: retargeting engines built early, spend that follows the weather, and the discipline to cut when the buying stops. Let’s plan your window before it opens.

Ready to Maximize Your Social Media
Potential?

We’d love to hear about your organization’s goals on social media. Get in touch with us today!

info@sociallyin.com